Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments
Ginsburg S, Eva K, Regehr G. Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments. Academic Medicine. 2013 Oct 1;88(10):1539-1544.
Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships
Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical education. 2013 Apr;47(4):362-374.
Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference?
Dudek NL, Marks MB, Wood TJ, Dojeiji S, Bandiera G, Hatala R, Cooke L, Sadownik L. Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference?. Medical teacher. 2012 Nov 1;34(11):e725-731.
Using “Standardized Narratives” to Explore New Ways to Represent Faculty Opinions of Resident Performance
Regehr G, Ginsburg S, Herold J, Hatala R, Eva K, Oulanova O. Using “standardized narratives” to explore new ways to represent faculty opinions of resident performance. Academic Medicine. 2012 Apr 1;87(4):419-427.
A comparison of performance evaluations of students on longitudinal integrated clerkships and rotation-based clerkships
McLaughlin K, Bates J, Konkin J, Woloschuk W, Suddards CA, Regehr G. A comparison of performance evaluations of students on longitudinal integrated clerkships and rotation-based clerkships. Academic medicine. 2011 Oct 1;86(10):S25-29.