“She said…He said”: Negotiating Scholarly Collaborations When we have Different Ways of Knowing
Dr. Glenn Regehr & Ms. Sue Murphy
Date: September 3, 2019
Time: 12:00 – 1:30PM
- formal presentations and discussion from 12:00 – 1:30pm, with a pause at 1:00pm for those who need to leave early
- feel free to bring a bagged lunch
Locations:
- LSC CMR 1312 (host venue)
- DHCC 2262
- SHY E404
- NHSC 9-374
Remote Access: Additional access options are available. Please email ches.communications@ubc.ca to request remote access.
Abstract
The field of health professional education scholarship is perhaps unique in the variety of stakeholders involved: students, teachers, administrators and researchers all work and interact with each other, often in highly valuable ways. Communication and collaboration are often straightforward, however conversations about scholarly projects can sometimes feel as if people are talking at cross purposes. As an educational practitioner (Sue) and researcher/theorist (Glenn), we have spent the last 5 years exploring how our own ways of developing knowledge (how we, as scholars, learn) and representing that knowledge (what was learned) have led us to “mutually dissatisfying” conversations about potential scholarly projects (and, by the way, WITA presentations). In this session, we will share our two perspectives as we have come to understand them and open the floor to a conversation about how these two perspectives might be better represented in our collective conversations about scholarship at CHES.
Objectives
- Open a conversation related to different “ways of knowing”
- Discuss how different ways of knowing can expand and strengthen the scholarly endeavor
- Explore the need for “different ways of knowing” to be better represented in scholarship within the CHES community
The University of British Columbia Division of Continuing Professional Development (UBC CPD) is fully accredited by the Committee on Accreditation of Continuing Medical Education (CACME) to provide study credits for continuing medical education for physicians. This program meets the certification criteria of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and has been certified by UBC CPD for up to 18 (1.5 per session) Mainpro+ Group Learning credits. Each physician should claim only those credits accrued through participation in the activity.
RCPSC Accreditation
What I’m Thinking About… is a self-approved group learning activity (Section 1) as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.